Newsletter

December 2006


The information contained in this Newsletter is of a general nature and does not constitute legal advice


LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS - BRAZIL

   Tax Treaty approved by the Brazilian Government 1

Additional 0.5% levied over the Employees Severance Indemnity Fund (“FGTS”) 2

Outflow statement related to services and goods exportations 2

Brazilian Federal Revenue publishes normative ruling on special fiscal regime for real estate developers 2

Mandatory application of resources in Research and Development (R&D) of the electric area and in programs of energetic efficiency to the final customer 3

Client Identification, Maintenance and Real Estate Transactions Registration. 3

Arbitration clauses in public agreements 4

 

 

TAX

Tax Treaty approved by the Brazilian Government

Decree no. 5922, published on October 4 of 2006, approved the Tax Treaty between Brazil and South Africa to avoid double taxation and prevent tax evasion with regard to income tax.[back]

Additional 0.5% levied over the Employees Severance Indemnity Fund (“FGTS”)

Among other dispositions, Complementary Law no. 110/01 set forth an additional 0.5% over the FGTS, in order to cover the expenses derived from the understated inflation of the economic plans “Verão” and “Collor 1”. The forecast for the initial collection term was established in October 2001 and valid for a period of 60 months.

However, some entities filed claims against the initial collection term. In these cases, the Federal Supreme Court (“STF”) stated that the collection period would commence in January 2002.

In addition to this controversy regarding the commencement of the initial collection term of the additional 0.5% over the FGTS, entities must also bear in mind the conclusion of the collection term, since depending on when payment was first made, the 60 month term may have already elapsed. [back]

Outflow statement related to exports of services and goods

Normative Ruling n.º 687, of the Brazilian Federal Revenue, (“NR 687”) published on October 30, 2006, determines that individuals and legal entities resident abroad that maintain foreign currency related to exports of services and goods must file with the Federal Revenue Office, on an annual basis, a statement concerning the use of such funds.

It must be noted that the funds kept abroad may only be used for investments, financial applications or payment of obligations, it being prohibited to use them for making loans of any nature.

NR 687 requires that each legal entity keep an accounting book for these purposes, regardless of the income tax system that has been chosen.

Failure to file the above statement is sanctioned with fines amounting to 0.5% per month or fraction, to be calculated on the basis incident of the value of the funds kept or used abroad and not informed to the Brazilian Federal Revenue within the legal term, up to a maximum fine equal to 15%.

It is worth mentioning  that the fine may be reduced by 50%, in case the statement is filed before the Brazilian Federal Revenue starts proceedings. On the other hand, in case of fraud, the penalty may be duplicated. [back]

Brazilian Federal Revenue publishes normative ruling on special fiscal regime for real estate developers

Normative Ruling n.º 689 (“NR 689”) of the Brazilian Federal Revenue, published on November 29, 2006, changes the rules applicable to the special fiscal regime for real estate developers (“SFR”), created by the Federal Law n. 10.931/2004.

The SFR is an option for the real state developer by which each project and its ancillary elements cannot be seized in case of debts of the real estate developer concerning Corporate Income Tax, Social Contribution over Net Profit, and Social Contributions (“PIS and COFINS”) for the Social Security. For each project subject to SFR, the real estate developer must pay 7% of the income arising out of the sale of that specific project per month.

The main development of NR 689 is that, as from November 29, 2006, all the real estate developers that choose the SFR must register each of their projects in the National Registry of Legal Entities (Cadastro Nacional de Pessoas Jurídicas, the so-called CNPJ). Nowadays, such regidstration may be made through the Federal Revenue website. [back]

 

ENERGY

Mandatory application of resources in Research and Development (R&D) of the electricity area and in programs of energetic efficiency

Normative Resolution n.º 233, of the Electric Energy National Agency, of October 24, 2006, established the methods and procedures for the calculation, application and payment of the funds to be used by the concession holders of public services for Energetic Efficiency and/or R&D projects, as well as for Technological and Scientific Development National Fund and for the Ministry of Energy,.

It is worth mentioning that wind, solar and biomass generators, co-generators and mini-hydro generators are excluded from the above obligations. Auto-producers are also excluded, except in relation to the revenues derived from the output sold. [back]

 

REAL ESTATE

Client Identification and Real Estate Transactions Registration

The Financial Activities Counsel (“COAF”) enacted on October 23, 2006  Resolution 14 (“Resolution 14”) effective as from November 26, and which sets forth the procedures to be followed by legal entities engaged in promotion and sale of real estate. Resolution 14 seeks to prevent and avoid money laundering crimes.

Such legal entities must be registered in the COAF, keep their records updated, and provide certain information such as trade name, enrollment with the National Registry of Legal Entities, registered address, and identification of the person responsible for compliance of Resolution 14  and identification of clients. Also, all real estate transactions amounting to R$ 100.000,00 or more must be reported to the COAF.

Notices to COAF must be made within 24 hours, and the registrations and records must be kept for a minimum period of 5 years as from the closing date of the transaction.

Failure to notify a transaction may be deemed to constitute a crime. [back]

 

ARBITRATION

Arbitration clauses in public agreements

A decision issued by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice in the Special Appeal no. 612.439 - RS, published on September 14, 2006, stated that agreements entered into by Brazilian public companies engaged in the production and trade of goods or in the rendering of services, which contain arbitration clauses, are valid and binding on the parties, who will have to submit to arbitration any potential dispute and conflict arising from said agreements. The issue was not free of doubt prior to this ruling.[back]

 

 

 

© DIAS CARNEIRO ADVOGADOS
Al. Santos 2224
Tel +55(11) 3898 1642
Fax +55(11) 3898 1646
01418 - 200 São Paulo
(Brazil)

 

If you have any queries regarding this Newsletter (re: registrations, cancellations, problems
viewing the pages) please send an e-mail to: circulardiascarneiro@dcadv.com.br

The information contained in this Newsletter is of a general nature and does not constitute legal advice